4. Isa Bela2019/02/19 16:22
[ответить]
>>3.Лыжина Светлана Сергеевна
>>>2.Isa Bela
>>I wonder if the "conqueror of hearts" expression has to do with what they say Mehmed said he wanted to do in Constantinople - to conquer hearts! Interesting!
>Unfortunately in the original Turkish text there's no word "fatih"
>And in this ghazal it's the beloved who called "conqueror of hearts". It's not the Sultan.
Exactly! It is the beloved who's called conqueror of hearts!
Is it not strange? Sounds as if he is placing the beloved in equality to himself.
Oh, what is the word in the Ott. Turkish for "conqueror" besides "fatih"? I dont have the original yet :))
Anyway, Mehmed, that ginger-haired fox, wouldn't use his title for that matter. An approximate word for the idea, it can be, no?
3. * (sergeevna2@yandex.ru) 2019/02/19 15:42
[ответить]
>>2.Isa Bela
>I wonder if the "conqueror of hearts" expression has to do with what they say Mehmed said he wanted to do in Constantinople - to conquer hearts! Interesting!
Unfortunately in the original Turkish text there's no word "fatih"
And in this ghazal it's the beloved who called "conqueror of hearts". It's not the Sultan.
2. Isa Bela2019/02/18 23:02
[ответить]
I wonder if the "conqueror of hearts" expression has to do with what they say Mehmed said he wanted to do in Constantinople - to conquer hearts! Interesting!
1.Удалено написавшим. 2019/02/18 22:12